What to include in a Business Requirements Document (BRD)

By | 17/09/2016

Introduction

As described in the article A comprehensive guide to the major Business Analyst deliverables a BRD contains a catalogue for all of the business requirements, a priority for each and a justification.

The purpose of it is to:

  • Gain a consensus and understanding of all of the business requirements in scope for the project
  • Understand which of the requirements are mandatory to the extent that if they weren’t delivered the project would not be worth doing.
  • Pre-requisite for being able to start system requirements to ensure traceability.

 

Guidelines

A business requirement document must be non-solution specific.  The rationale is to separate out the what from the how.  The how can change but the what should be more static.  You shouldn’t have to keep changing the requirements in the document every time a different solution is discussed.

By contrast a functional specification contains system requirements.  These are defined once the system boundaries are established and go into detail of the functionality required and the interactions with other people or systems.

 

Contents

1.Executive Summary

The first section in the BRD should be an Executive Summary.  The executive summary should be no more than 1 or 2 sides.

It should set out:

1.1  Introduction

To set the context (no more than half a page).

1.2  Audience

To show the audience the BRD is aimed at and the teams impacted.

1.3  Related documentation

Any related documentation that is related such a Vision documents, Business process model documents etc.

1.4  Scope

To include in scope and out of scope

 

2.  Functional Business Requirements

The second section is the Functional Business requirements.

Each requirement should be given a priority.  See below for a template of the rating classification table to include as a guide.  It can be difficult to get the business to give a priority of anything less than essential because they may fear they won’t get it otherwise.

Questions to ask to validate a essential requirement is to establish whether it is needed from day 1 and what would happen if they didn’t have it.

Rating Description
Essential (E) This requirement is essential to the success of the project.  The project cannot adequately deliver without this requirement.
Important (I) This requirement is important and is extremely useful in delivering the benefits of the project.
Desirable (D)

 

This requirement is desirable, and is nice to have if time and cost allow it.

Below shows an template for listing the business requirements.

Req. Ref. Title Description Priority Source Rationale
  • Every requirement should have a requirement reference that should not change.
  • A title is included to provide a brief description of the requirement in 2-3 words.
  • A description is to describe each functional requirement in business terms.
  • Priority is based on the rating table above.
  • Source is to provide an audit of who provided the requirement. This is useful to know who to go back to if more information is required or there is a challenge.
  • Rationale is to provide the reason for why the requirement is needed and what is expected for the success of the requirement being delivered.

3.  Log

A log should be kept towards the end of the document listing the following that were uncovered during the BRD processDecisions

3.1  Assumptions

3.2  Issues

3.3  Risks

3.4  Dependencies

 

4.  Document Control

A Document control section is also needed and is normally kept at the very beginning or end of a BRD.

This section should contain the following:

4.1  Version control

Version Date Summary of changes Author

4.2  Distribution

Name Role Date issued Reviewer or for information Version no

4.3  Approval

Name Role Date approved and supporting evidence

It is important to understand who needs to review and approve your BRD.  It is also important to ensure the BRD gets signed off.  For help on this see tips for obtaining sign off of documentation.

Thoughts? Questions? Please share in the comments.

 

If you have found this article useful then you might like my book – The Business Analysis Handbook – Techniques and Questions for better Business Outcomes.  The book is available from www.koganpage.com and all major print and e-book retailers.

Author: Helen Winter

An Management Consultant responsible for structuring programmes, success criteria, mobilisation, management of scope, budget, timely delivery, benefits realisation and stakeholder satisfaction. Helen has led on large transformation programmes to execute delivery along with strategic business outcomes. Helen is also a global business author with publisher Kogan Page where her first book “The Business Analysis Handbook” was a finalist for 2 major industry awards. One was for contribution to project management literature with PMI and the other was the Specialist book category for the business books awards. She is an active member of the APM programme management group. She is currently involved in a focus group sharing examples of good programme management practice and is an established speaker for project management forums. In her free time, she loves sharing her knowledge on her blog BusinessBullet.co.uk which is followed by over 5000 visitors a month.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.